We’ll get to it 😅 didn’t expect so much interest in additional test runners
Joshua Flanagan
•
Sep 26, 2024
Also would like to add that we are considering currents for our company’s playwright testing - but not having vitest support right now is a definite downside!
Bruna Chagas
•
Aug 9, 2024
Dear Currents team,
My company is in need of a test observability tool, and we are considering Currents as a potential option. However, it's essential for us to be able to measure the integration and unit tests in Vitest. Without this capability, we won't be able to select Currents as our tool of choice. I kindly request that this functionality be given high priority so that we can proceed with using this tool. Thank you!
Andrew Goldis
Team•
Nov 28, 2024
Hello Bruna! Sorry for the delayed response. I connected with you on LinkedIn - let’s have a conversation and discuss more details 👀
Log in to comment and vote
Comments5
Andrew Goldis
Feb 13, 2025
https://github.com/currents-dev/currents-junit-xml-example/blob/main/packages/vitest/README.md
Andrew Goldis
Sep 26, 2024
We’ll get to it 😅 didn’t expect so much interest in additional test runners
Joshua Flanagan
Sep 26, 2024
Also would like to add that we are considering currents for our company’s playwright testing - but not having vitest support right now is a definite downside!
Bruna Chagas
Aug 9, 2024
Dear Currents team,
My company is in need of a test observability tool, and we are considering Currents as a potential option. However, it's essential for us to be able to measure the integration and unit tests in Vitest. Without this capability, we won't be able to select Currents as our tool of choice. I kindly request that this functionality be given high priority so that we can proceed with using this tool. Thank you!
Andrew Goldis
Nov 28, 2024
Hello Bruna! Sorry for the delayed response. I connected with you on LinkedIn - let’s have a conversation and discuss more details 👀